The University of
Queensland Art Gallery's exhibition, Return to Sender, is a
glittering and sober trip down memory lane in which curatorial flair
and a spacious exhibition space enable an intimate experience of a
politically volatile and sometimes dangerous era in Australian Art.
The two-fold
curatorial focus of the exhibition concentrates on a small group of
artists who left, or escaped, Brisbane in the late 1970s and early
1980s. The reasons for their exile were largely politically
motivated, for the Joh
Bjelke-Petersen government had created an environment that was
stifling for both artistic creativity and free speechi.
The second focus of the exhibition focuses on narrowing the mediums
that are presented, curating only works that “incorporate aspects
of photography and photomedia”ii,
following the influential blooming Sydney art scene to which those
Brisbane artists fled.
With
such a narrow set of guidelines dictating the form of the exhibition,
I was somewhat suspicious of the type and quality of the work that I
might find as I entered the upper levels of the UQ Art Gallery. Robyn
Stacey's two photo montages on perspex greeted me as I entered and I
immediately found myself thrown back into a 1970s film narrative of
my my own devising. Both contain images of women I believe to be the
heroines, movie-styled and gazing beyond the setting and the viewer.
I was in a streetlight lit carpark outside a small-town pub or motel,
and I was in a high-rise with the burgeoning city pulsing below as
the emotional drama unfolded, reflected in the thick glass. The rise
of feminism and the empowerment of women in the turbulent 1970's
speak strongly through these works and I found myself drawn to the
heroines and their challenges in the city and the small town, and
their determination to achieve in the darkness of oppression,
reflected in the artist's inspiration:
Stacey
made these works four years after the ABC-TV aired in 1985 Chris
Masters's investigative report 'The Moonlight state', which
highlighted corruption, and coincided
with
the release of the Fitzgerald Inquiry report.iii
I
was impressed, and was not disappointed as I discovered the
photo-weaving of Fiona MacDonald in her glowing series entitled
Universally
Respected.
The juxtapositions enabled by MacDonald's skillfully produced works
are not just the weaving of two images, but also the interweaving of
multiple histories through the conflagration of a colonial portrait
of men from the Rockhampton Club, and a portrait of the 'other',
indigenous or poor immigrant. This could perhaps be derided as an
ideological vision, but MacDonald's voice is a protest against
“whitewashing”, literally, the history of Rockhampton, and
championing the rightful place of the non-white population through an
“interrogation of local history”iv.
Jeff
Gibson's wall-papered wall of Trigger
Happy posters
refer more directly to the dark political undertones of the
exhibition, and “signals the rule of the gun”v,
perhaps a direct reference to Bjelke-Petersen's 'police state'. His
Dis-
posters
are more refined and less likely to arouse contention, even though
they attempt dissonance, they end up being glossy dialectical
compositional portraits of famous films and their stars.
The
film component of the exhibition has great depth, though its outdated
methods and technologies could be termed humorous. As an historical
perspective on 1980s and 90s video art, the films, such as Gary
Warner's Resistance
Today and
Mark Titmarsh's Viva,
provide a genuine insight into the turbulence and experimental
attitudes of the “new media” artists of the period. Biting
anti-film chaos seems to be the favoured form of video expression in
the exhibition, and succeeds in transporting the viewer into a
vortex-like world of new sounds, sudden changes and general disquiet,
perhaps also succeeding in capturing the paranoia and fear
experienced by some of the artists within society at the time.
Along
the other walls lay diverse pieces by the ever-consistent Tracey
Moffatt glamourising her ancestry, a strange balustrade-spear
piercing some photos in perspex by Rosemary Laing, and some
intriguingly produced prints by Lindy Lee who repeatedly photocopied
images in order to blacken them into nothingness.
The
narrow curatorial selection criteria of Return
to Sender
had very little impact on the exhibition's ability to show a wide and
varied range of experimental and new-era art that was being produced
in the 1980s and 90s by this small group. The overarching theme of
exile from the northern 'police state' of Joh Bjelke-Petersen only
adds to the depth of the audience's interaction with the artwork, and
strengthens them through placing the works in a wider socio-political
framework that still retains the individual trajectories of each
artist.
iReturn
to Sender, Introduction,
(Exhibition Catalogue), 2012, University of Queensland Press,
Australia.
iiReturn
to Sender, Introduction,
(Exhibition Catalogue), 2012, University of Queensland Press,
Australia.
iiiRedline
Series, [didactic], Return to
Sender Exhibition, Queensland University Art Gallery, Queensland
University.
ivUniversally
Respected, [didactic], Return
to Sender Exhibition, Queensland University Art Gallery, Queensland
University.
vTrigger
Happy, [didactic], Return to
Sender Exhibition, Queensland University Art Gallery, Queensland
University.
No comments:
Post a Comment